FERC Chairman Talks Transmission System Regs Before the US House Subcommittee

Testimony of Chairman Jon Wellinghoff, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Before the House Energy and Commerce Committee, Subcommittee on Energy and Power, United States House of Representatives
Hearing on The American Energy Initiative, October 13, 2011
Full testimony document

Highlights of this testimony:
The development of an efficient transmission system benefits consumers by reducing barriers to trade within and among regions and thereby enhancing competition in wholesale electric markets.  With this goal in mind, and recognizing that significant transmission investment is likely to be made in the foreseeable future, the Commission recently issued Order No. 1000.

–First, Order No. 1000 emphasizes regional flexibility and regional action.  Order No. 1000 aligns transmission planning and cost allocation to ensure that, when a region identifies transmission projects as needed and desired by that region, the region will have
a method in place for allocating the costs of those projects.

–Second, Order No. 1000 states that those who do not benefit from new transmission facilities should not pay.

–Third, Order No. 1000 is about establishing effective processes for transmission planning and cost allocation, not about requiring specific outcomes from those processes.

–More generally, it is important to note that Order No. 1000 does not establish pre-set regional boundaries, nor does it prescribe how regions plan their systems.  Under the rule, each region defines itself.

–The reforms of Order No. 1000 will:  (1) ensure that all regions in the Nation produce a regional transmission plan; (2) encourage broad and open consideration by public utilities and their stakeholders of numerous potential solutions to identified needs  so that transmission facilities  selected in the regional transmission plan for purposes of cost allocation are appropriate solutions for that region; and (3) increase the number of transmission facilities that move from the proposal stage to operation by specifying in advance who would pay for  such regionally selected facilities.

EIA Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report: The Supply Builds

Yesterday’s report showed a 112 Bcf build in storage. This is towards the upward range of the rolling 5 year average. Going into the winter heating season this points to adequate supplies. The shale gas production does not seem to cause the storage to grow beyond the average. I wonder why this could happen? Will the storage capacity increase to accommodate the shale gas production? A few years ago the gas storage was greater than the stated storage capacity.

Along this line there was a news article reporting that Conoco had bought Marathon’s portion of an Alaskan LNG export project. This is the only facility with an export license at this time. This could make the US an energy exporter for the first time in many years. The LNG would presumably come from Alaskan fields and not directly affect the lower US.

EIA Storage Report