Can Competition Remake the Electricity Industry?

By Travis Fisher & Nick Loris

Creativity and competition are at the heart of dynamic economies. Thanks to modern reforms in industries previously regulated as natural monopolies, American consumers have reaped huge savings. Our lives are better today because of the successes of restructured industries as diverse as telecommunications, rail and airline transportation, and—to some extent—electric utilities.

So why is electricity the ex-monopoly in which consumer prices constantly go up while measures of quality (like reliability) are flat or declining, no matter how much competition we throw at it? As consumer groups have pointed out, we still don’t have definitive answers to this question, and we should keep digging. In our view, competition hasn’t delivered benefits to electricity consumers because we haven’t really given it a chance.

When we talk about competition, we mean the open-ended market process of willing sellers competing to do business with willing buyers (no monopoly privilege, mandates, or subsidies). Sellers strive to beat out their peers while contending with the fact that the …

Power market overhaul embroiled in potential conflict of interest

Shelby Webb

In October, Colorado-based E3 Consulting offered a plan for how the Public Utility Commission should redesign Texas’ deregulated power market. It produced a 44-page proposal, paid for by energy giants NRG and Chicago-based Exelon.

Now the PUC — saying it wants an impartial review of the proposals — has hired E3 to analyze the plans, including its own.

A PUC contract signed May 10 shows the consulting firm will receive up to $364,000 for its review. The contract notes that E3 would create an “internal firewall” to protect against bias in the report, but the contract’s administrator for E3 is first among four authors listed on its market redesign plan.

E3 didn’t respond to a voice message or email requesting comment. The PUC, in a statement from …